
OK.I am making fun of curators with this image. Sorry. It was hard finding a suitable image to illustrate this post. I do a lot of listening to the radio. WGBH's new all talk radio is on my car so I hear interesting interviews when I run errands or go back and forth to the athletic club where I work out.
Today I heard an interview about parenting. The conversation was about "helicopter parents" micromanaging their children. They talked about kids needing time for themselves, time for creating their own play, time to get bored, etc. The woman being interviewed said "Parents today feel they have to 'curate' their children's lives." I was blown away by the use of the word and what it says about curators and their exhibits.
What came to mind is all the curators whose goal is filling the gallery with information with no concern for the visitor and the visitor's needs. I would agree with this mother's use of the word both in parenting and in museums. So many curators don't look at the use of negative space, breath, exploration, contemplation, and visitor dialog. I used to say to my project teams "Our need to give should not exceed the visitor's need to receive." By filling galleries to overload aren't we telling our visitors there is only one way to engage with an exhibit?